 |
| Sipahi |
The
Ottoman Army became the most feared army in Europe. In 1453, it dealt a blow that shocked
Christian Europe to its core. The mighty citadel of Constantinople
fell to the hands of the Ottoman Turks, who turned it into their magnificent
capital and renamed it Istanbul. The Ottoman army credited for victory became
even more well-known. It had a lot of elite units within its ranks. It had the
famous Janissaries. But to the belief of many, the through strength and fierce
warriors within the Ottoman army was its horsemen known as the Sipahis.
Sipahis
were a social class and a military unit in the Ottoman Empire. They served as
heavy cavalry forces in complementary to the light cavalry force known as the
Akinci. But they also served as landowners within the Ottoman Society. They
were very much similar to the Companion Cavalry of the Ancient Greek Army of
Alexander the Great.
Recruitment
of the Sipahis developed as the Ottoman Empire also progressed. In the 14th
century, like the Janissaries, Sipahis were recruited from the child levies
from the provinces of the empire. The Ottomans did not placed importance
whether they were Muslims or not. Later on, the recruitment changed from child
levies to owners of land grants from the Sultan known as Timar. Hence, Sipahis were
sometimes known as Timariots.
Every province of the Ottoman Empire had to provide a number of Sipahis to the
Ottoman army. A single Sipahi had to fight in military campaign seasons of
March to October. If a Sipahi failed to fight for seven years, he was stripped
of the position as a Sipahi. He was also to be demoted to the position of lower
echelon of Ottoman society known as reaya.
Because
Sipahis were land-onwers they were very much self-reliant when it comes to
their equipment. Sipahis were expected to collect taxes and help in maintaining
the lands. Taxes collected from their Timars were used to purchase armor and weapons.
Also, part of the collected taxes were paid to the personal servants of the
Sipahis, known as cebelu. Cebelus joined their masters during the time
of military campaign. They aid them in wearing their suit of armor as well as
taking care of the horses.
A
Sipahi’s equipment were no cheap. The rider wore mail and plate armor. Also,
iron helmets were worn. But the spectacular part of the Sipahis as being known
as heavy cavalry was the armor that they provided for their horses. The horses
were covered with armor made of iron, giving it an appearance of a tank in the
modern age. A Sipahi was armed with typical weapons: sword, lance, bow, and
maces. They served as flank guards of Ottoman Armies in battle. And during
attacks, they broke down enemy formation. Their appearance caused
demoralization within enemy ranks. Hence, Europeans perceived Sipahis as
credible threat, a strong force, and the most superior cavalry force in the
continent.
Sipahis
served the Ottoman Empire for a long time. Most especially during its glory
days from the 15th to 17th century. However,
during the 16th century, Sipahis began to decrease in number. Lose of land and
lose of interest in battle of Sipahis led to the decrease in number and
effectiveness. Sipahis began to pay substitutes to fight in their behalf. By
the 18th century, the Sipahis began to disappear as a military unit. As social
class, it continued until 1847.
The
Sipahis was a unit feared more by the Europeans than the acclaimed Janissaries.
Their sophisticated appearances brought fear to the enemy and they matched it
with their ferocity and effectiveness in battle. They contributed to the rise
of the Ottomans and brought glory in its name.
See also:
Bibliography:
Jelavich, B. History
of the Balkans, Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. New York: Cambridge
University Press, 1983.
Mikaberidze, A. (ed.). Conflict and Conquest in the Islamic World: A Historical Encyclopedia.
California: ABC-CLIO,LLC, 2011.
Smithsonian. Military
History: The Definitive Visual Guide to the Objects of Warfare. New York:
DK Publishing, 2012.
Somel, S. A. Historical
Dictionary of the Ottoman Empire. Maryland: Scarecrow Press, 2003.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteWhy did not the Ottomans conquer Italy?
ReplyDelete