Angkor Wat (Drawing by Henri Mouhot) |
Lying
in the center of marsh and jungle, the Angkor Wat stood as one of biggest
temple in the world. Cambodia took pride of this temple and depicted it in its
national flag, lying in its center. It became a monument of Hindu influence to
Southeast Asia and to the belief that Kings become Gods once they died. But
most importantly, Angkor Wat stood as legacy of the once mighty Khmer Empire.
The
Angkor Wat became the most famous and well-known monument of the one of the
greatest civilization in Southeast Asia – the Khmer Empire. The Empire
flourished between the year 802 to 1295, but some scholar suggested that it
might have been older. It commanded a large army fed mostly by rice coming from
the fertile lands near the Mekong River and the largest seasonal lake in the
world, the Tonle Sap Lake. With a strong military and a bountiful agricultural
economy, the Khmer Empire controlled a huge territory encompassing Cambodia,
Southern Vietnam, and some parts of Thailand. Another result of power came in
form of a flourishing culture, mostly influence by Hinduism. The Kings of the
Khmer Empire used the Hindu idea of Devaraja or God-King where when a King
died, he became a God. Hence, the Kings of the Khmers ruled absolute under
divine authority.
In
1113, a new King ascended to the throne. Suryavarman II came to the throne
after he had vanquish two of his contenders to the throne. Hs reign became
widely known for his conquest and expansion of the Khmer Empire. He expanded
the territory to the north by defeating the Kingdom of Champa. Besides this, he
also sent envoys to China in order to conduct a lucrative trade with them. From
plunders in wars and wealth from trade, Suryavarman II decided to build a
temple dedicated to his patron deity, Vishnu. He wanted the temple to mirror
his greatest and display in every way his reverence to the Hindu Gods.
His
builder did not disappointed him. As soon as he consolidated power, work began
immediately for what became the Angkor Wat. The layout of the temple mirrored
Hindu cosmology. A 200 meter wide moat surrounded the square land of the temple
that symbolized as the ocean surrounding Mount Meru. Two causeways crossed the
moat, one in the west and one in the east. But the western causeway served as
the main because the west was usually associated to Suryavarman’s God Vishnu.
The western causeway greeted visitors with statues of lions and seven headed
nagas. And on the island of Angkor Wat, three layers of temple, one elevated
above the other stood. At the center, five magnificent ornately sculpted towers
stood symbolizing the five peaks of Mount Meru – Meru being the center and the
other peaks being Ketumala, Bhadrasava, Jambu-dvipa, and Uttara-Kuru. The two
layers of encirclement of the main temple symbolized the mountains that
surrounded Mount Meru. The builders intended that the central tower that
symbolizes Mount Meru will serve as Suryavarman II’s last resting place,
symbolically meant that Suryavarman joined with his fellow Gods. It took
numerous amounts of sandstone and laterites in order to complete such temple of
a huge proportion. In addition to laborers, Suryavarman II recruited talented
carvers in order to carved long beautiful bas-reliefs that depicted Hindu
mythology, Hindu mythology, and Khmer History. The most famous this reliefs
depicted the story of the Churning of the Ocean of Milk that centered on
Vishnu, who advised the Devas or Gods to churn a huge ocean of milk in order to
regain their immortality. The construction of Angkor Wat took numerous years
and workers in order to complete.
It
took 30 years for the Khmers to complete Angkor Wat. However, the construction
finished, King Suryavarman II passed away just years away from its completion.
They laid the ashes of the King in the shaft at the center tower of Angkor Wat.
Above the shaft, they placed a statue of Vishnu, which meant to be the
depiction of Suryavarman, given the posthumous name of Paramavishnuloka or He
who had entered the heavenly word of Vishnu. His burial in Angkor Wat
accomplished his goal of becoming God-King.
However,
more than two decades after the death of Suryavarman II, Angkor fell to the
hands of invading Champa from the north. But the Angkor soon fell back to the
hands of the Khmer Empire under King Jayavarman VII during 1180’s. Jayavarman
VII’s reign, however, marked a shift in Khmer culture, from Hinduism, they
turned to Theravada Buddhism. The days of Angkor Wat as a temple for God Kings
and Vishnu ended. Angkor Wat then became a Buddhist shrine. In 1431, the
neighboring Ayudhya attacked the disintegrating Khmer Empire and sacked the
Angkor. After the fall of Angkor to Ayudya, the Khmers abandoned the once
active and rich capital, leaving the jungle to cover and claim Angkor Wat.
For
centuries, Angkor Wat stood silently within the dense thick jungles of its
surroundings. Some Buddhist monks continued the site, but the knowledge about
the monument remained to only few. In 1860, with France’s increasing
involvement in Cambodia, French adventurer, Henri Mouhot, trekked tropical
rainforest, risked malaria or other deadly disease, and uncovered one of the
greatest heritage of humanity. He reintroduced the world to the greatest of
Angkor Wat.
Today,
Angkor Wat amazed millions of its visitors. For Cambodians, it reminded them of
their glorious past as well as the innovative and the creativity of their
ancestors. For mankind, it meant the hardwork, perseverance, determination, and
ingenuity that people from the past had in order to build such a monument for a
King. A monument larger than any temple in world and competed with other
churches, shrines, temples when it came to aesthetics and design. Angkor Wat is
a monument dedicated to a God-King but a testament to human brilliance.
See
also:
Bibliography:
Charles
Higham. Encyclopedia of Ancient Asian Civilizations. New York, New York: Facts
on File, Inc, 2004.
Donald
Langmead & Christine Garnaut. Encyclopedia of Architectural and Engineering
Feats. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, Inc., 2001.
The
Cambridge History of Southeast Asia. New York, New York: Cambridge University
Press, 1999.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.